Writing Effective Employee Handbooks

posted by Michael Fortney  |  Dec 15, 2009 1:06 PM in Employment Law:Workplace Issues

Employee handbooks provide important guidance to employees about benefits, vacations, holidays, work rules and the laws of your workplace. Some courts have found that statements in employee handbooks created contracts, however. In order to provide your employees with the benefit of clear, evenly applied policies without the risk of contract liability, we recommend the following steps.
 

Reinforce the at will relationship


Why do you want to have an at will relationship?

Employment at will means that the employer and employee can both end the employment relationship at any time and for any reason that is not prohibited by law. Reasons prohibited by law include an employee's age, sex, color, race, creed, national origin, religious persuasion, union affiliation, or disability, or in violation of Ohio law or federal law. Employment at will therefore allows an employer to terminate an employee without a lengthy and expensive process of proving just cause to terminate.

Some employers worry that at will employment means that their employees will be less loyal. To make their employees feel more secure, some employers might try to assure them that they will have a job "as long as there is work here." By doing so, they invite employees to file suit based on the statement, on the theory that they have the right to rely on it as a contract.

If the employer has made clear throughout the employment relationship that employees are at-will, the employer will minimize implied contract liability. The first place to reinforce the at will relationship is in the employment application. It should include a verification for applicants to sign that acknowledges the existence of the handbook and the at will relationship. For example, an employee handbook disclaimer could state:

 

 

In consideration of my employment, if hired, I agree to conform to the rules and regulations of [Employer], and my employment and compensation is "at will" in that they can be terminated with or without cause, and with or without notice, at any time, at the option of either [Employer] or me, except as otherwise provided by law. I understand that no manager or representative of [Employer], other than the President, has authority to enter into any agreement for employment for any specified period of time or to make any agreement or contract to the foregoing, and that any promises to the contrary will only be relied upon by me if they are in writing and signed by the President.


Second, reinforce the at will relationship in the handbook with a statement along the following lines:

 

 

 

 

You should understand that employment at the Company is not offered, contracted or promised for any specific length of time. If at any time you are not fully satisfied, you may terminate your employment. Just as you will be free to terminate your employment at any time for any reason, [Employer] reserves the same right, on the same basis, to terminate your employment.


Finally, reinforce the at will relationship for a third time in the Verification page of the handbook. The verification page needs to be signed and detached from the handbook and placed in the employee's personnel file. The verification should include the following:Also, it should be noted that your employment is considered an "at will" arrangement, meaning that you may terminate your employment at any time and the Company has this same right.

 

 

 

 

Use of disclaimers and acknowledgments


Employees are presumed to be at will. Further, employment for an indefinite period of time is presumed to be employment-at-will. See, Henkel v. Educational Research Council (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 249. As a general rule, either party to an oral employment-at-will agreement may terminate the employment relationship for any reason not contrary to law. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co. (1985) 19 Ohio St. 3d 100, 103. However, Ohio law recognizes two exceptions to this general rule, being implied contract and promissory estoppel. .

Under the implied contract exception, a handbook may be found to alter the terms of employment at will if the employee and employer have agreed to create a contract from the writing. Absent of mutual assent, however, a handbook is merely a unilateral statement of rules and policies which creates no rights and obligations.

The elements necessary to establish a claim for promissory estoppel are:

 

 

 

  • a promise clear and unambiguous in its terms;
  • reliance by the party to whom the promise is made;
  • the reliance must be reasonable and foreseeable; and
  • the party claiming estoppel must be injured by the reliance.

In Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co. (1985), 19 Ohio St. 3d 100, the Ohio Supreme Court recognized the doctrine of promissory estoppel as being applicable and binding to employment-at-will relationships. The court stated that the test for such cases is as follows:

 

 

 

whether the employer should have reasonably expected its representation to be relied upon by its employee and, if so, whether the expected action or forbearance actually resulted and was detrimental to the employee.


Disclaimers may limit liability. The Ohio Supreme Court has said that unless there has been fraud in the inducement, "a disclaimer in an employee handbook stating that employment is at will precludes an employment contract other than at will based upon terms of the employee handbook." Wing v. Anchor Media Ltd. of Texas, (1991), 59 Ohio St. 3d 108. Pursuant to this holding, the existence of such a disclaimer precludes an employee from successfully using language in a handbook to demonstrate an implied employment contract. .

 

 

 

 

Identify the applicability of the handbook.


The handbook should state which classifications of the employer's employees it applies to. The employer should have a good reason for the handbook not to apply to all employees. All employees should abide by the same work rules. To differentiate causes resentment. All employees are subject to same EEO policy, safety policy, substance abuse policy, etc.

If certain policies in the handbook are for certain classifications of employees, however, the handbook should clearly state that (i.e., tool requirements for certain employees, hours for work, break times, etc.).

 

 


Revision History

Most Recent Articles

NLRB Declares Chipotle Company Policies Unlawful An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued her ruling in the Chipotle case ...
Ohio Court of Appeals Upholds Arbitrator’s Authority When Arguably Construing or Applying Contract A recent ruling by the Ninth District Court of Appeals ruled that a trial court cannot vacate an arbitration award beca ...
Ohio Supreme Court Upholds Liquidated Damages Provisions in Construction Contracts The Ohio Supreme Court overturned the Fourth District Court of Appeals' holding that a $700 per day liquidated dama ...
2nd Circuit Agrees with NLRB; Facebook "like"s are Protected Activity In 2014 the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its ruling in  Triple Play Sports Bar . It decided that&n ...
NLRB Revises Joint-Employer Standard as Applied to Staffing Agencies In a recent decision, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) clarified its joint-employer standard, deciding that em ...